U.S. Senate Holds Hearing on Federal Toxic Substances Control Act
(TSCA) Reform
|
The chemical industry trade associations and
public health officials support EPA Administrator Jackson's plan for
reforming the 1976 law, which has been little used by the
agency.
Both Republicans and Democrats agreed that this
reform provides a real opportunity to avoid duplication of efforts at
county, state and federal level (specifically mentioning BPA, lead and
phthalates), creating a patchwork of requirements.
It was agreed that many chemicals, when used in
appropriate amounts, are beneficial to society, but when compounded in
the human body or combined with other chemicals create health hazards
and become lethal. The example used was fluoride being added to
drinking water and toothpaste in small amounts is beneficial, but
massive amounts of it could be lethal.
Republicans supported reform and review of
chemicals that is based on science; that a cost benefit analysis be made
for businesses and consumers and a process that protects confidential
product information.
|
The U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, chaired by
Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA), and its Subcommittee on Superfund, Toxics
and Environmental Health, chaired by Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), convened a
hearing on Wednesday, December 2, 2009 to examine the Federal Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA). This is the third Congressional
hearing this year on reforming the 33 year-old law.
Senator Boxer said TSCA reform is her number one priority and
she’s proud to represent the state of California, the leader in
chemical regulation in the U.S. Senator Boxer also said that it
was past time to overhaul the entire chemical industry and although she
was proud to lead the regulation of phthalates under the Consumer
Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) she did not want to see these
issues addressed piece-meal but rather all together in one piece of
sweeping legislation.
Senator Lautenberg announced during the hearing that he plans to
reintroduce his TSCA Reform legislation in the next few weeks.
"Often when government tries to write new laws or modernize old ones,
there is resistance," Lautenberg said during the hearing. "But this is a
case where everyone agrees on the need for change. We need to make good
on this unique opportunity. That's why in the coming weeks, I plan to
re-introduce legislation to strengthen our chemical laws. Our bill will
put the burden of proving chemical safety where it belongs: on chemical
companies. Instead of waiting for a chemical to harm someone’s
health, it will require companies to prove that their products are safe
before they end up in a store, in our homes, or in our bodies. We
already regulate pesticides and pharmaceuticals this way -— it's
just common sense that we do the same for chemicals that are used in
everyday consumer products."
During her testimony before the committee, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lisa Jackson used the hearing as
an opportunity to present the Obama Administrations’ Essential Principles for Reform of Chemicals
Management Legislation which were created to aid Congress
during the legislative process. The principles, listed below, present
the administration’s goals for legislation that will give EPA the
mechanisms and authorities to expeditiously target chemicals of concern
and promptly assess and regulate new and existing chemicals in
commerce:
- Chemicals should be reviewed against risk-based safety
standards based on sound science and protective of human health and the
environment;
- Manufacturers should provide EPA with the necessary information to
conclude that new and existing chemicals are safe and do not endanger
public health or the environment;
- EPA should have clear authority to take risk management actions when
chemicals do not meet the safety standard, with flexibility to take into
account sensitive subpopulations, costs, social benefits, equity and
other relevant considerations;
- Manufacturers and EPA should assess and act on priority chemicals,
both existing and new, in a timely manner;
- Green Chemistry should be encouraged and provisions assuring
Transparency and Public Access to Information should be
strengthened;
- EPA should be given a sustained source of funding for
implementation.
Following Administrator Jackson’s testimony, most Committee
Members left the hearing room; Chairman Lautenberg continued the session
with a two-person panel comprised of John Stephenson, Director, Natural Resources and
Environment, GAO, and Linda Birnbaum, Director, National Institute of
Environmental Health Sciences. Both Birnhaum and Stephenson echoed
many of the same sentiments for the need to protect the public from
dangerous chemicals through reform.
TIA members will be kept apprised as additional information regarding
the TSCA reform becomes available.
|